Mr Ticktin noted: "Sounds simple enough, right? But when you start to realize that there were four different models of Macs, two virtualized environments, XP and Vista, some of which were 64-bit and multiprocessor, along with a whole slew of tests, each that had to be runs several times, there were over 2500 tests completed, timed with a stopwatch." The thorough testing of these products can be a difficult task. Since the initial testing, Fusion has moved to version 2, Parallels has gone to version 4 and Microsoft has published Vista SP1. VMware Fusion" which will be published in the April 2009 MacTech Journal, print edition.
#VMWARE FUSION VS PARALLELS FOR MAC FOR MAC#
Ticktin has updated the analysis in " Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. And, as we said before, if you want the best XP performance with the types of applications tested here, Parallels is not only faster than VMware Fusion, but it's faster than Boot Camp on average for the applications that we tested."Īrmed with the previous experience testing the products, Mr.
(And, although we didn't test it, we would expect VMware Fusion to have better multi-processor support if you really have an application that is designed to take advantage of it.) If your goal is tight integration between one or more Windows applications and Mac OS X, Parallels is the clear winner when running either XP or Vista.
#VMWARE FUSION VS PARALLELS FOR MAC MAC OS X#
"And, if you want to keep your Mac OS X and Windows environments completely separate, VMware Fusion's design may be your better choice. "If you want the best virtualization performance for Vista, then VMware Fusion is your choice. That said, Parallels was somewhat faster in general than VMware Fusion for XP. Furthermore, in our tests, both VMware Fusion and Parallels performed well, and were a good user experience. "If you want a virtualization product (that allows you to run Windows alongside Mac OS X) and you want the best performance for the types of things that we tested, then clearly you need to run XP and not Vista. "If you don't want Mac integration, and just want to run Windows, go with Boot Camp. Vista was fairly new, service pack 1 (SP1) wasn't released until March 18, 2008, and XP was still the favored OS for the vast majority of Windows users.Īt that time, the author Neil Ticktin, editor-in-Chief of MacTech Journal, concluded: In the initial analysis, the focus was on application benchmark testing. On Wednesday, MacTech Labs revisited the two programs and asked the Big Question: Which one should the prospective customer choose?
Since then, Vista SP1 was published and both virtualization products have matured. In February, 2008 MacTech Labs published the quintessential comparison of VMware's Fusion and Parallels Desktop.
0 kommentar(er)
